Details and Metadata
Printer-friendly version View XML version Download Ecological Metadata Language file
Methods
The methods followed in the creation of the dataset, including description of field, laboratory and processing steps, and quality control procedures
Current Methods
Soil population monitoring
Started: 1989-05-01Method 2. Soil populations are monitored using fall soil samples with forced emergence to estimate relative populations. Two bulb-planter soil samples are collected in the fall from 2 and 4 m from each of 5 selected sugar maple trees. Injury to foliage is recorded on associated trees.
Past Methods (No longer in use)
- Adult population monitoring
Started: 1991-04-01
Ended: 1991-06-13Method 1. Adult population levels are monitored weekly using 4 yellow sticky traps located at 3 feet above ground during flight period (April - June). Damage to sugar maple foliage is assessed using 8 trees.
Dataset Fields
Detailed documentation of the fields comprising the dataset, including the type of measurement, units where applicable, and any controlled vocabularies or code lists present in the data
Field Name Caption Description Additional Information ID ID Automated ID number
Measurement type: Ordinal Location Location Location of data collection
Measurement type: Nominal Elevation Elevation Elevation of study site
Measurement type: Ratio
Unit: unavailable
Precision: 100SampleDate Sample Date Sample date
Measurement type: DateTime
Date/Time Format: otherEmergenceYear Emergence Year Emergence Year
Measurement type: DateTime
Date/Time Format:Totalthrips_soilpreviousfall Total Thrips Grand total number of thrips (from soil previous fall)
Measurement type: Ratio
Unit: unavailable
Precision: 1Averagethrips Average Thrips per Soil Sample Average thrips pers soil sample (grand total # of thrips divided by 10)
Measurement type: Ratio
Unit: unavailable
Precision: 1Numberofsamples Number of Samples Number of samples taken at the site
Measurement type: Ratio
Unit: unavailable
Precision: 1Emergencefromstickytraps Emergence from Sticky Traps Number of emergences from sticky traps
Measurement type: Ratio
Unit: unavailable
Precision: 1CountySoilAverage County Soil Average Average numer of thrips for county soil
Measurement type: Ratio
Unit: unavailable
Precision: 1NorthernStateAverage Northern State Average Average number of thrips for the northen state
Measurement type: Ratio
Unit: unavailable
Precision: 10StandDamageRating Stand Damage Rating Stand damage rating
Measurement type: Nominal
Stand Damage Rating
+ showAppears in data as Meaning of code None (0) no pear thrips damage detectable Light (1) Most leaves mottled with yellow spots, some slightly stunted or puckered. Leaf are reduced by 1-30% Moderate (2) Most leaves stunted, deformed and browned at the leaf edges. Some leaves may be tattered. Leaf area reduced by 31-60% Heavy (3) Most leaves tattered and severely stunted. Some buds may be killed. Leaf area is reduced by 61-80% Severe (4) Near or complete defoliation. Leaf area reduced by 81-100% StandRatingComments Stand Rating Comments Stand rating comments
Measurement type: Nominal Sampling Equipment
Equipment and software used to collect data, including how that equipment was used.
Current Equipment
Sticky traps, bulb planter
Started: 1989-05-01Yellow sticky traps. Bulb planter.
Site Characteristics
The spatial extent of the dataset site coverage, and descriptions of the spatial extent and context for the data collection
- Site Description
West slope of Mt. Mansfield, in sugar maple stand at Proctor Maple Research Center, and at 3 elevations in the Stevensville Brook headwaters (1500, 2000, and 2500 feet) as part of the Forest Management Study.